So now I have a DSLR. It's a
Canon 60D. That happened faster than I was expecting.
I knew from the start that I would go for one of the big two: either Canon or Nikon. I didn't really consider the offerings of Sony or Olympus. I had a few reasons for this, including less dependence on a single manufacturer. I can't deny that the prestige (and associated self-confidence boost) of being able to say 'I own a Canon/Nikon' played a role in my decision.
I decided fairly early on that I would go for Canon over Nikon, because of things I'd heard about the former's more extensive lens range, and that their cameras are well suited for videographers, which I am interested in dabbling in. I did a humongous pile of web research trying to compare the various EOS models until I arrived at the 60D.
It concerns me how little some other people seem to research their purchases before they buy, especially with something so expensive as a DSLR camera. They rely on one, maybe two sources: anecdotes from their family and friends, and the in-store salesperson.
The salespeople in electronics stores are still taught to espouse the 'megapixel myth' - namely more equals better. This really isn't true. The glass you put on the front of a DSLR body matters a hell of a lot more than the sensor inside it. If you squeeze more pixels into a sensor without making the sensor larger, then you lose dynamic range and gain pesky noise.
On top of the 60D body, I invested in a 17-85mm IS USM - which will be my walking around lens - a 55-250mm IS telephoto zoom, and a 50mm f/1.8 fast prime.
I also have an 18-55mm kit lens which I will keep as a backup, or if I take the camera out where it may be damaged, rather than risk my better 17-85mm. I feel this is a fairly versatile entry-level collection of glass.
In any case, this contraption should keep me busy for a while. I'm teaching myself composition technique and photoshop skills as I go along. Oh, and she's called Miranda.